1.
Camera
Work
The camera work used in The Artist is very
similar to early sound films, the most of which is the framing of particular
scenes. Most movies from that era focused on the faces of the actor and rely
heavily on their expressions to communicate their emotions, as well as have
very little background in the shot. The Artist follows this style exceptionally
well, and it is hard to distinguish how the film was created so recently. One
give away that the film was made recently is when the wife sees her husband
being kissed by a girl on the front of the newspaper, the camera starts with
the small picture of the headline and zooms out to show the whole scene. Back
then this was very uncommon, most films would end a scene with the close up,
not start it out with one.
2.
Sound
& Music
The easiest reason for this being similar
to an early sound film is the fact that it is accompanied by a musical score
and it relies on this score to communicate the emotions of a scene. The music
matches to the scenes of the film very well like most films from this era.
During a scene where Peppy is caught kissing George’s jacket, the music quickly
heightens as she realizes she has been caught. When it comes to sound and music
I had a lot of trouble telling that the film was made in 2011, but one case is
when the score does cut off the film is actually silent. It was hard for older
films to be completely silent because the equipment was so loud.
3.
Dialogue
& Speech
The Artist does resemble films from the
early sound era in that you cannot hear the voices of the actors and the amount
of actual dialogue in the movie is scarce. Movies nowadays often have constant
talking between characters and silence is saved for dramatic parts, the Artist
relies on the actors to portray their thoughts and emotions through kinesis. I
knew the film was from 2011 with a simple middle finger gesture in the first
part of the film, old films were not outgoing enough to show this in their
films.
4.
Editing
There two distinct scenes in the Artist
where they transition to another scene, one by folding the image over the old
to create he new scene, and another by blacking out the screen to the middle
then opening it back up to a new scene. This was very common for the early
sound film era. It is clear the Artist was made in 2011 because of the sharp
clarity of in all the scenes; they could not achieve this back in early sound
films.
5.
Special
Effects
Although I have never seen this in
other early sound films, when George is at the bar he imagines a little version
of himself telling him to change his ways as he is not doing anything with his
life since he is no longer acting. They also show George being shocked in a
clip of one if his films, the electric waves are faked but add to the scene. I
could tell it was from 2011 because they did not yet have the technology to
have people imagine little versions of themselves, and attempt to swat them
away to no prevail.
6.
Genre
Codes & Conventions
This film has a classic silent era plot,
the man who has it all suddenly loses it and is torn between his crippling
professional life and the new love he feels for a woman that is not his wife.
He is emotionally beat with his personal and professional life and almost took
his own life only to be rescued at the last second by his new founded lover. I
new this film was from 2011 because they almost have a suicide occur, this was
a much more sensitive topic back then and it surely would not have been in an
older film.
7.
Acting
The acting in The Artist was very impressive
as new age actors had to travel back in time and rely on their ability to show
their emotions. This means many close ups and they must be able to change expressions
based off the scene in an instant. The film was clearly from 2011 because well
first off, I knew the actors in the film, and second, at the end of the film
all sound can be heard and they act as if it is a modern movie for the last 30
seconds or so.
No comments:
Post a Comment